Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 04:17 on 2 May 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

User-reported

• 170.52.130.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On GURT: Block evasion by User:Lebron Raymone James 0830. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 22:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. @LaffyTaffer: This is a new meme so it's less than clear that this is block evasion (which would also be better reported to WP:SPI most of the time). I'm going to protect the page, though. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  I was about to ask, it did start feeling like a meme. Thanks. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 22:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

• 2603:6011:7901:4967:A16B:6D4:773E:D33B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On GURT: Block evasion by User:Lebron Raymone James 0830. Taffer😊💬_(she/they) 22:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

• 2603:6080:BF0:CB0:1713:EEEB:FFA4:5C92 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – See edit filters for racist language. Knitsey (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

• Beachbunny87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism. crosswiki spam and sockpuppetry XReport --  — Jeff G. ツ 23:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

  @Jeff G. I'm not satisfied that what I can see on the English Wikipedia is enough for a block. If there are issues on other wikis I suggest seeking assistance from the Stewards here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

• Jooe2023 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalising by adding the redundancy of the information and keep reverting. 118.189.68.127 (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

  Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

• TCFFanmade2006YT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Avengers: Doomsday (diff): vandalism after final warning. Others and I have warned this editor on countless occasions not to add unsourced information to articles. After recently taking my concerns with the editor's lack of apparent understanding the sourcing requirement and for failing to communicate with fellow editors at the Administrators' noticeboard (which saw no action because it was archived, though the editor failed to respond to the incident report even when prompted to by an admin), this editor has continued in their unconstructive ways, with their most recent edit to the Avengers: Doomsday article reeking of blatant vandalism. I issued them one last final warning, though I believe they have been given far too much leniency and are not willing to reassess their actions to constructively build an encyclopedia. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)